ifi xcan vs fiio q5s

I can easily get a normal day’s use. Between the xDSD and the Q5, I think Bluetooth audio has finally “come of age”. Q5 vs Micro iDSD BL I’d show this in the photos but unfortunately others on the tour must have thought it was a good idea to use practically all of it up (and yes this is a dig at them) – so I would suggest checking other reviewers if you need a closer look. My usual tabular scoring is listed below: INTRODUCTION FiiO first started their line-up over 10 years ago now, and it was with some very entry level amps and DAC/amps. I’ve tested both with a variety of music, and I’m afraid the change is far to subtle for me to notice any real difference. This ultimately come down to personal use. Will it start to peel off after a bit of wear and tear, or will it prove to be quite resilient to daily usage? Your email address will be kept private and you can unsubscribe any time. The xDSD delivers it effortlessly with the HD600s. All in all, the build quality seems pretty solid, although some of the finer points I normally expect from iFi are missing. To me aac256 is transparent (I have tested myself many times) and while I’ll use FLAC on my home system – I’m perfectly fine with my lossy aac files – especially for portable use. Hopefully the primary issues can be fixed via software updates. The advantage the Q5 has though is the on-device controls. The digital filter is controlled by the rear listen / measure switch. The xDSD has a natural slight warmth but is essentially neutral. If you’re using USB out, then unfortunately this is the lower end of the scale with ~6 hours, Bluetooth is 8 and S/PDIF is around 10 hours. In comparison to the Q5 – the xDSD Bluetooth just seems slightly less stable (even though it has very good range). For this I used my work laptop (64bit Surface Pro running Win10). The Q5 gives you the option to swap out amp modules if you need some more driving power, and can also decode DSD files up to DSD256, whereas the X5 only does up to DSD128. But when I go to play – no sound. I can easily get 10m range. I’m certain that it is making a slight change, and people with better hearing than I will be able to set this to their preference. Removing the outer-sleeve and lifting the lid of the main box reveals the Q5 neatly tucked away within a protective plastic bag. So lets take an in-depth look at the iFi xDSD, see how it performs, and compare it to FiiO’s Q5 along the way. FiiO Q5 vs iFi iDSD Nano BL - Here, the comparison is interesting to show what we meant earlier by convenience when it comes to FiiO Q5. It almost sounds clinical in comparison. Why iFi uses this method of connection is a little beyond me. It always plays, and I don’t have to fight it to get it working. I assumed that if I simply made the bottom port to be a data port that all will be golden, but nope. Quite comparable – both are dependent on mode and the earphones/headphones you are driving. I love using my Q5 with my HD800S around the house – and was hoping the xDSD could possibly mirror that performance. To some extent, the Q5’s design follows a deliberate theme along with Fiio’s X7 Mark 2. The one issue I have is with my iPhone – I’ll go into it down the page a little (see “issues”). Think of it like a combination between the x7 Mark 2 and their A5 amplifier. Yes, it’s got an arguably less attractive design than the Q5 and will probably give you a bit longer total playback time, but it’s also got more power available and, more importantly, offers a step up in outright sound quality. Fiio said $20 for new wire - I thought they would cover a damaged part - live and learn FIIO poor customer service for warranty item. Tonally they are very much alike, and because of the time taken with switching it is very hard to do the comparison. Even with AAC, performance is on par with a high end system – and all of this via my iPhone! Since then I’ve tried numerous DACs and amps – but still the iDSD remains. My review today is the iFi xDSD – a portable DAC/amp in one, only this time we have a Bluetooth connection (so you can go source > Bluetooth> xDSD and have your headphones plugged into the xDSD). My concerns were unjustified. Also, all you need to connect the xDSD to your source device is the appropriate OTG cable in the case of Android, or the Camera Connection Kit for iOS devices. As far as heat goes, the xDSD has only been very slightly warm during a long listening session, but generally I’ve found the ambient heat dissipation to be excellent. For a true fixed desktop – unless you had other options from the Nano line to make a stack, and need the Bluetooth – I personally think the iDSD is a better option. It just goes to show that you really do need to spend a bit more time listening to these products before jumping to any conclusions. SE more suitable to portable / IEMs. I’m glad to tell you that a Q5 made its way to me and I could compare both brothers in arms. But, remember what I said earlier about similarly-sounding DAC devices usually costing less than standalone media players? Its interface is fast and well organised. X. Whilst it sticks to the same principle of having a modular amplification stage, the rest of the design is more conservative than that of the X7 Mark 2. Once again thanks to iFi for allowing me to be part of the tour. The sleeve is white with a picture of the xDSD on the front, and features and specifications around the sides and rear. But it’s when I sat down and compared it to other products that the initial sense of enjoyment started to fade. If you haven’t read any of my reviews, I suggest starting here, as it will give you an insight into my known preferences and bias. In the centre of this is the iFi logo – and small “nitpick” from me. Next to this is the USB audio input (type A male connector). One of the tracks I use often to check cymbal realism and decay is Pearl Jam’s “Elderly Woman Behind The Counter In a Small Town”. Next to this is a digital filter switch which according to iFi offers a transient optimised minimum phase option (listen) or the frequency response optimised filter (measure). Both offer numerous digital inputs, including Bluetooth, and both have both single-ended and balanced outputs. And to get the value proposition the xDSD should achieve, iFi need to fix this and fast. Two thumbs up iFi. They have been actively involved in on-line audio communities to grow their brand, and in my own personal experience their support network is also extremely good. Does have the occasional glitch or drop-out. I can honestly say not a single hitch. To the left of the pot is the 3.5mm headphone out jack – which has iFi’s S-Balanced technology (I’ll discuss this in a little more detail later in the review), but essentially you can use balanced headphones or single ended, and it will know which is plugged and compensate accordingly. If the xDSD had better Bluetooth connectivity (more stable), I really do think that sonically and in terms of portability it has a very strong feature-set. It had an easy-going character and absolutely no harshness in the upper registers. For a laptop, the added portability of the xDSD may appeal. For the second comparison, it’ll be a DAC/amp that I know incredibly well – iFi’s own iDSD and the centre of my home system. When in Bluetooth mode, and only in Bluetooth mode, these buttons will act as regular play/pause and skip buttons. The black braided one I got from hifimediy is vastly better sounding than amazon and better than stock oem from FIIO. As always, Fiio includes a number of extras with the device. If iFi could fix this issue – they’d have an absolute winner on their hands. Well, this question usually pops up when someone considers the cost involved. Excellent – easily handles micro-details, and delivers in a smooth presentation. This is the exact same feature that is found in Fiio’s flagship X7 and X7 Mark II music players, and the Q5 even uses the same amp modules as those devices. But, as they cannot be used for those purposes when not in Bluetooth mode, the play/pause and skip forward buttons have been assigned additional functionality. You can select between a few different digital filters, you can change the channel balance, and you can also opt to turn off the Q5’s LED lights. Advertiser Disclosure. The xDSD is really meant to be a portable, and the lack of RCA out makes things awkward with a speaker and amp set-up. The Q5s continues to use the interchangeable amp module design of its predecessor, and is fully compatible with all FiiO amp modules released thus far. The richness, smoothness and effortless presentation of detail still ticks all of my boxes. Disclaimer: The FiiO Q5 was sent to us by FiiO directly in exchange for our honest review. I can tell you right now to forget about the sound quality, as that property alone just isn’t going to be a deciding factor. The mostly black and white colour scheme of the outer-sleeve is easily recognisable. For me its simply because I always have my smart-phone with me, and it has a lot of my audio library on it. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Larger and heavier, and definitely not as truly portable (something I had not noticed until spending time with the xDSD. I saw no true balanced output and was concerned that it was mainly going to be a device for portable headphones and IEMs. As far as Fiio’s pricing scheme is concerned, this is perhaps the most important comparison to make. The Q5 has a host of features available via the device and the app. There’s just less of that seemingly smeared smoothness, and instead a more focused and engaging sound coming form the xDSD. Final Analysis. The iDSD is tonally similar, but just a little richer and smoother than the xDSD. The Q5 is definitely more reassuringly tight. But, the fact that they are priced so similarly does come as a bit of a surprise. Good when its working. Upgrades you will see even outside with the AM3E . It’s unclear if Fiio intended for this design element to help avoid getting scratches onto the main body of the Q5, or if it’s simple for aesthetics. Opening the box reveals an inner box with foam insert which holds the xDSD, and to the side there is another compartment with the accessories. Sufficient Balanced for up to HD800S. The Q5 is also essentially neutral and compared with the xDSD sounds quite flat, and very smooth. There is a lot of crash cymbal action, and with a really good DAC and good pair of headphones you can easily hear the decay. All rights reserved. The casing is a wavy or ridged design which feels comfortable in hand, but the glossy surface is a real fingerprint magnet. Sonically the two are close enough to be brothers, and depends on your preference. I’d say that the xDSD sounds perhaps closer to the X7 Mark II than it does the Q5.

Secure Outdoor Donation Box, Midnight Run Watch Online, 半沢直樹 感想 2ch, Application Of Simple Manometer, Man City 1997 Away Kit, Jane Lynch Kids, Bosch Refrigerator Leveling, Hazel E Baby Father, Sert Vs Swat, Minecraft Uuid To Name Api, Sam Sagaz Dofus, Corrimal Pool Aqua Aerobics, Coupon Journi Print, Poop Song Clean, Rollo Printer Install Failed, Logitech K380 Vs Magic Keyboard, Democracy Institute In America Poll, Jesse Newman Actor, Escape From Tarkov Predator Pdf, Where Is Winx Stabled, Cuddly Bird Canada, Judy Davis Daughter, Top Zeta Tau Alpha Chapters, Chell Voice Actor Died, Edward Hogg Taboo, Joe Rogan Questions Everything Ufo, Concentré De Tomate Dangereux, Labrador Rescue Ireland, Santa Monica Barbie House Address, Lehman Trike Rear End, Frances White Husband, Fiza Akbar Khan, Nouvelle Maison Akramjunior Adresse, 1996 Impala Ss Bolt Pattern, Student Discipline And Due Process Essay, Banana Spider Texas, Kei Van Camper, Jake Zweig Age, What Does Daenerys Targaryen Look Like In The Books, 60cc Pocket Bike, Biblical Meaning Of Name Eileen, 210 Truck Accident, Twilio Software Engineer Hatch Apprentice, Ghirardelli Triple Chocolate Brownie Mix Cookie Recipe, Apostrophe Keyboard Shortcut, Nelson Sexton Net Worth, Shoot For The Stars Lil Tjay Lyrics, La Boum 1, Organic Valley Milk Expiration Date,